My column for Mathrubhumi (translated in Malayalam)
Appeared on Sunday March 29, 2020
https://english.mathrubhumi.com/features/social-issues/covid-19-measures-should-also-acknowledge-mumbai-s-poor-1.4673545
Appeared on Sunday March 29, 2020
https://english.mathrubhumi.com/features/social-issues/covid-19-measures-should-also-acknowledge-mumbai-s-poor-1.4673545
She lies on the pavement, every part of her
body covered with a thin sheet. I pass by her every day. This is Uma, a child of the street, who will
turn 18 next month. At the age of 16 she
gave birth to a little girl, who will turn two next month.
As our world staggers with the reality of a
deadly virus that is crossing borders and regions, spare a thought for those
like Uma and her child. She has no walls
that can provide her social isolation.
She has no water with which to wash her hands. And she has no confidence
to approach a health provider for fear she will be turned away. And this, in India's richest city, Mumbai.
The crisis the world, and India, face with
the steady spread of Covid-19, has exposed much about our societies. In India, above all it has exposed the
callousness of the entitled and the weakness of our public health system.
The fact that the virus came to India
because those with the money to travel abroad brought it in has still not sunk
in. Every day you read stories of people
who have travelled refusing to accept that they should voluntarily stay at home
and not infect others, that they should get tested when required, and that they
should accept isolation if tested positive.
Instead, what we witness is many who are
simply not following this protocol. As a
result, even though so far we are being told that there is no community spread
of the virus, do we really know? Already
in Mumbai, a domestic help tested positive because she works in a house where
the owner, who had just returned from the US, tested positive. Multiply such instances and you get the
picture.
And then, the women who work as domestics
live in over-crowded urban settlements, where dozens occupy tiny spaces, where
water is scarce and sanitation inadequate.
The idea of "social
isolation" in such a place is unimaginable.
How long before the infection spreads, if
it has not already done so?
I ask because even as we concentrate on
limiting the spread of infection, and increasing our capacity to test for
Covid-19, we also need to address the unchanging reality like the living
conditions of the urban poor that make the spread of infection virtually
inevitable.
The most vulnerable are those without any
shelter, like Uma. She is part of a
family of waste pickers. Every day, they
sort dry waste. They touch paper,
cardboard, plastic and other forms of waste that would have been touched by
many hands, including those with the infection.
I haven't heard of any plan to keep these citizens of our cities safe
from infection.
Instead, middle class housing societies are
talking of ways to shut the poor out, in the belief that they are the ones who
carry the infection. Typically, they refuse to accept that it is their class
that has contributed to the spread of the infection. Not just accidentally
because they happened to be in the countries that had already been stung by
Covid-19. But by refusing to take the
necessary precautions, such as social isolation and testing to ensure that no
one else gets it.
If there is anything I wish at this time of
death and disease it is that those with wealth realise that if we have a system
that works for the poor, it will work for everyone. On the other hand, no privatised health
system can prevent the spread of a deadly virus because it will automatically
exclude those who are the most vulnerable, people like Uma.