Broken News
Link: https://www.newslaundry.com/2020/04/23/stalked-by-coronavirus-hounded-by-the-state-losing-jobs-is-nobody-looking-out-for-indian-journalists
The post-pandemic media scene is grim, with fewer jobs and shrinking
spaces to report without fear.
When journalists and journalism become the
news, we need to be concerned.
In the course of the last 72 hours, three
journalists in Kashmir have been slapped with cases, two under the draconian
Unlawful Activities Prevention Act for posts on social media and the other for reporting "factually incorrect" news.
While such cases and intimidation by the
police and the security forces are a daily hazard that journalists in Kashmir
have had to contend with for decades, as this report in The Caravan documents, the FIR against
one of the few women journalists in Kashmir is surely a first.
Masrat Zahra is an exceptionally talented young photojournalist whose work has
appeared in Al Jazeera, The Washington Post, and elsewhere. She
has broken new ground in a state where journalism has been almost exclusively a
male domain. Today, apart from Zahra, there are several women journalists who
stand out for their courage and for the quality of their work.
Charged under the UAPA for Facebook posts
from 2008 and 2018, as reported by Scroll, and identified only as a "Facebook user" and not a
journalist, the FIR against her is bizarre in more ways than one. Why she has
been singled out, and that too for posts of photographs that have been
published, will unravel in the days to come.
What is concerning, however, is the message
that this sends out. By slapping cases on two experienced journalists apart
from Zahra – Peerzada Ashiq from The Hindu and author
and journalist Gowhar Geelani – are the powers-that-be in Kashmir, who take directions directly from
New Delhi, reminding Kashmiri journalists that nothing has changed for them,
even during this Covid-19 pandemic? That their freedom extends only as far as
the rope that is held by the authorities, and that it can be yanked at any time
without notice? Given this, journalists in mainland India need to respect,
applaud and support their counterparts in Kashmir for continuing to report
under these conditions.
The cases against Zahra, Ashiq and Geelani
have reminded us of the ugly reality of Kashmir, a land of unfreedoms ruled by
people who claim they are committed to democracy. There have been statements of
support from the Editors
Guild of India, Committee to Protect Journalists, Network of Women in Media, India, and others. Whether these will shift Delhi's determination to keep
the media in Kashmir on a tight leash remains to be seen.
Elsewhere, journalists have been in the
news for another reason, getting infected by Covid-19 in the line of duty. When 53 out of 167 TV journalists in Mumbai
tested positive for the virus, alarm bells rang in the journalist community. A
pandemic cannot be reported working from home, or even from an office. It
requires feet on the ground. And this is precisely what these journalists, many
of them fairly young, and the cameramen from television channels were doing.
But without proper advice on precautionary measures, directions that ought to
have come from the seniors in their organisations, and the necessary equipment
to stay safe, it was inevitable that some of them would pick up the infection.
What is tragic is the feeling amongst many
of them that they lack support from their organisations. When one of the young journalists tested
positive and informed her senior in the office, the message she got back was:
“Take care and don’t step out for a few days,” according to this report in The Wire.
Since the Mumbai testing of media
professionals, other municipalities and governments, such as Delhi, have also
made these provisions. But that is not good enough. Journalists need to know
before they step out at such times the risks they face, and be informed of the
support that will be available to them.
Indian media organisations generally lack
any established protocols when their reporters are sent out in situations that
could be hazardous for them, be it war, internal conflict, riots, or pandemics.
Journalists are expected to wing it with no assurance that if they are affected
physically, or psychologically, their organisations will step in.
An experienced reporter with a magazine
wrote recently on social media, "While there is nothing new in the
callousness shown by media houses for the well being of their reporters, this
time, the consequences are going to be deadly. Despite my initial restlessness
at not being allowed to go out to report, I am just so glad that my
organisation stopped us from putting our lives at risk. We continue to write
stories from our homes without compromising the quality or our health. Because
let's face it: our organisations don't provide us with any safety gear, whether
it be a war zone or health emergency." She adds, "Every time I have
gone into unsafe terrain, it is another reporter or civil society contact who
has had my back."
This should not be the case. If there's
anything salutary that can emerge from this crisis, as far as the media is
concerned, it ought to be the institution of safety protocols for journalists
in all media organisations.
Organisations like the BBC, for instance,
have safety protocols for journalists in dangerous situations and there is also
mandatory training before a person is sent out. In the current crisis,
according to a BBC staffer in London (who asked not to be named), "The
intranet site has a Coronavirus help site prominently displayed and we have a
whole Health and Safety and Risk management team who are involved." There is also a doctor on call.
While people have been given the option of
working from home, many producers have to go to the office because they need to
use technical equipment. "The producers, previously not entitled to take
taxis into work...have been allowed to use taxis (which the company is paying
for) to and from work and they have also secured free parking around the
building in central London so that those who want to can drive. This keeps us
safe from the crowds on trains and the underground...this is one of the best
things they have done."
None of this is rocket science and is the
very minimum that media houses can do for their employees who literally risk their
lives to step out to record the news as it happens.
In the current economic crisis, given the
precarious financial state of most media houses, perhaps asking even for this
much is wishful thinking. In my last column, I noted the salary cuts that some journalists were being asked to
take and predicted that job losses would follow. This has already begun to
happen, with a slew of layoffs even in bigger media houses. The longer the
pandemic persists, the more chances of job losses. This is happening not just
in India, but also in other countries around the world, including Britain as this report by
the BBC points out.
Meanwhile, journalism as we have known it
will suffer. If the journalists who are eager and keen to go out and report are
not assured that their interests will be looked after, or even that their jobs
are secure, why would they take a chance? The problem for most journalists
today is that quitting what they have in hand is not an option as there are few
alternatives available. Freelancing remains precarious. It is poorly paid, and
payments are slow to come if and when they do.
So in a post-Covid future, what do we
envisage? On the one hand, the state has tasted the power to make the media
fall in line, either through direct intimidation as experienced by Kashmiri
journalists for decades, or by putting pressure on owners to fall in line as we
have seen in these last years in India.
India has fallen two places in the 2020
World Press Freedom Index, from 140
to 142 out of 180 countries. Perhaps,
this means little to the ordinary reader or viewer. But it will become evident
in the content they consume. As far as journalists are concerned, the
post-Covid media scene is grim, with fewer jobs and shrinking spaces to report
without fear.
PM Narendra Modi has urged industry not to cut jobs following the crisis created by pandemic and the subsequent nationwide lock down. Yet Conglomerates such as Reliance, Leyland, Spice jet, online travel portals who have been severely hit have announced their decision on drastic cut in pay and reduction in number of jobs.
ReplyDelete“Fewer jobs and shrinking spaces” projected in the article is applicable not only to journalism but to every industry that contribute to the economy .When COVID 19 has affected all equally and forcibly without discrimination on Countries and population, impact would be equal in all sectors without exception in all countries.
Recovery from the onslaught is an uphill task but not impossible. Much depends on the resilience power of citizens and support of government. The talented force in every sector, with the power of imagination and out of box thinking should drive themselves forward and steal the limelight. Japan could push memories of Hiroshima and bring the fruits of hard work be the subject of discussion. So should we be. In Post COVID 19 times, mantra should be
“What next from us”
and not
“What next from Government.”