I don't know about you, but I have not been
able to watch that video of Tabriz Ansari of Jharkhand being beaten to
death.
I will not even give the link to it even as
I write this. Because it marks the culmination of a month where the expected
happened, the BJP won a thumping majority in Parliament, and the dreaded
playing out of the consequences of this victory also happened. (But it is worth reading Apoorvanand
on this.)
Members of Parliament from the ruling party
mocked members of the opposition, including Muslims, with chants of "Vande
Mataram" and "Jai Sri Ram" as they took their oath,
unprecedented in the 57 years that the Indian Parliament has met. (Read Jyoti
Punwani's excellent piece on this.) And echoes of those chants reverberated in
different parts of India as individuals like Tabriz Ansari were targeted and
ordered to chant "Jai Sri Ram".
The depravity and brutality of the mob that
led to the death of Ansari is not an aberration. We, as Indians, are a violent
people. Given a chance, we will lash
out, hit, attack, lynch and butcher those perceived as our enemies. Compassion is not a highly regarded virtue in
our society. Gandhi knew this even as he appealed for non-violence. Today's
leaders know this too. But the idea of
non-violence and peaceful resistance is not part of their vocabulary. They
support vindictiveness through their words and by way of their silences.
Surrounded as we are today with the war cry
of "Jai Sri Ram" and the silences that denote acquiescence at one
level and defeat at another, what is the future?
At a meeting in Mumbai organised by Indian Express as part of its Explained
series, political scientist and commentator Suhas
Palshikar predicted the future in a few quiet words.
As he explained the concept of
majoritarianism in the Indian context, where a majority community will always
be dominant, and analysed the fallout of the BJP's election victory in the 2019
general elections, he said that in future, pogroms of the kind seen earlier
would not be needed because the message that Muslims can live happily in this
country if they live like Hindus, has already been conveyed.
This is being conveyed each time a Muslim
man is lynched. He does not have to be a cattle trader, or be accused of eating
beef. He is a target because he is a Muslim, a hapless representative of a
minority that has to be shown its place.
And now, inspired by our members of
Parliament, we have a new test of loyalty to "the nation", the slogan
"Jai Sri Ram". Another stick with which to bludgeon non-Hindus into
conformity. Another vehicle to instill fear and squash any notion of rebellion.
Not to forget that this government has
already issued orders that Foreigners' Tribunals, of the kind functioning in
Assam that are already seen as hallmarks of arbitrariness and injustice, can be
set up in any state. Combine this with the Citizenship Amendment Bill that the
government is determined to push through, which effectively determines
citizenship on the basis of religion and runs counter to the founding
principles of independent India, and you have the makings of an upheaval reminiscent
of the Partition, as Harsh
Mander writes in Indian Express.
I write this on June 25, 2019, marking 44
years since the midnight hour when Indira Gandhi declared a State of Emergency
and locked up the entire opposition. Press censorship was imposed, fundamental
rights were suspended and a shroud of fear descended on the country.
Yet, that dark and what appeared endless
night, did end. The blanket of fear was
thrown off. The Indian electorate did
vote out a person and a party considered irreplaceable because there was no
alternative.
We have no option but to cling to the hope
that things can change, that the trajectory of events today is not
irreversible, to not give up.
